No You Can't: Obama Campaign Sued for Trademark Infringement (but not really)

Generally, politics and IP law don't come into contact much, but this story was too fun to ignore. According to a humor column in New Jersey's Politicker, the phrase "yes we can" is trademarked by the National Center for Home Food Preservation and Canning, a D.C. lobbying group. (Get it?) A protest rally against the campaign's alleged trademark infringement drew a whopping 35 people. Asked about the lawsuit, a canning executive stated, "That slogan is known all over the country for just one thing: canning.”

Although not a real claim, we thought it would be interesting to give it a brief analysis. Since no consumer would reasonably believe Obama has entered the canning industry, presumably the claim here would be one of dilution. Under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006, the NCHFPC need only show that the campaign's use of the phrase is likely to cause dilution. However, they must also demonstrate that their use of the phrase is "famous" and "distinctive." Canning executives' claims aside, the "plaintiffs" here would be unlikely to meet this burden.

The full story can be accessed here.

Penn Law Review Seeks IP-Related Submissions

The University of Pennsylvania Law Review is seeking essay submissions advancing a legal argument related to the 2008-2009 symposium topic, "Foundations of Intellectual Property Reform." The symposium will explore possible reforms, innovations, and impending issues in patent, copyright, and trademark law.

The winning paper will be published in the University of Pennsylvania Law Review’s Symposium Issue in Spring 2009, and the author will be invited to attend the conference in Philadelphia on January 16-17, 2009.

For more information, following this link.

Prof. Lessig Praises Amateur Remixing

In an essay for the Wall Street Journal Online, Prof. Lawrence Lessig of Stanford Law condemns copyright owners for pursuing legal action against amateur creators. He urges several changes in the law, including the deregulation of the "amateur remix" and the de-criminalization of peer-to-peer file sharing. The full article can be read here.

The essay is excerpted from Lessig's book "Remix," which will was released yesterday.

Welcome Back!


The Penn Intellectual Property Group (PIPG) develops and promotes intellectual property programs within the Penn Law and greater Philadelphia community. Among its activities, PIPG has hosted panels on topics including IP Careers, Biotechnology, and Arts and Entertainment. Last year, we organized a symposium on copyright and technology that brought prominent legal scholars and representatives of Google, Viacom, Comcast, and Sony, among others (see posts below).

This year, we hope to be even stronger by creating additional on-campus programs and developing this blog as a resource for current developments in IP law. If you are interested in serving as a contributor to this blog, or in helping with our activities in any way, please contact Karen Chesley at karenac@law.upenn.edu.

More information about the club will be provided at our introductory meeting on Wednesday, October 15, 2008, in room G-213 at noon. Pizza will be served.

Video: William Patry on Internet Metaphors

William Patry, copyright blogger and Senior Copyright Counsel at Google, spoke about "Internet Metaphors and Why we Need to Lose Them." Mr. Patry explained that because judges have absorbed language in which the Internet is described as a "place" you can visit, courts have often come to the wrong conclusion.

Mr. Patry also countered Prof. Werbach's suggestion that Google had "no idea" how to make YouTube profitable. "I don't think we'd pay $1.65 billion dollars ... being clueless about how to [make a profit]." Mr. Patry said the plan for the site was to engage in more licensing deals.

Click below for the full video:

Video: Kevin Kuzas of Comcast Interactive Media

Kevin Kuzas, VP and General Counsel of Comcast Interactive Media, delivered a keynote address entitled "Copyright Challenges in Internet Video." Mr. Kuzas spoke about the issues faced by those trying to license video for the Internet.

CIM runs Fancast, an Internet video site which hosts content licensed from Viacom and other content providers.

For the full video, click below:

Video: Panel on User-Generated Content

Our first panel of the day was titled "User-Generated Content: Cooperation or Litigation?" Topics included the Viacom-YouTube lawsuit, the validity of litigation in creating beneficial legal precedents, and the impediments to full cooperation between content owners and content providers. For the full video, scroll down to the bottom of this post.

Kevin Werbach asserts that "YouTube doesn't even know how it's going to make money" as Google's Bill Patry looks on.

Viacom's Stanley Pierre-Louis (right) discusses his company's recent initiatives to add online content. Professor Michael Carroll of Villanova (left) listens.

Kevin Werbach of Wharton (center) registers his objection to the term "user-generated content" when describing copyright infringement problems caused by sites like YouTube.

Video, Part 1:

Video, Part 2:


The panelists, seated from left to right, were:
• Michael Carroll, Professor of Law, Villanova School of Law
• Stanley Pierre-Louis, VP and Associate General Counsel, Viacom
• Kevin Werbach, Assistant Professor of Legal Studies, Wharton
• Lance Koonce, Partner, Davis Wright Tremaine
• Gideon Parchomovsky, Professor of Law, UPenn Law (moderator)